Re: Timestamp docs weirdness

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marcus Börger <mail(at)marcus-boerger(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timestamp docs weirdness
Date: 2003-10-26 08:30:15
Message-ID: 3F9B8617.6080106@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> OK, do we want to put back the mention of these in the release notes?
> The non-zulu ones sound pretty strange to me and might be better left
> undocumented.

What's there to go in the release notes? We haven't changed any code,
and zulu is the only 'named' timezone we support (from checking source
code).

I've just reorganised the docs, so that it's actually explained what
they are.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-26 08:32:49 Re: random access - bytea
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-26 08:28:29 Re: Function Permissions

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-26 14:03:20 Re: Timestamp docs weirdness
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-26 04:55:34 Re: ISM shared memory on solaris