| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregor Zeitlinger <gregor(at)zeitlinger(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Date: | 2003-10-23 13:09:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3F97D2F7.20601@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-chat pgsql-hackers |
>>4. Extend the contrib/ltree gist-based tree indexing scheme to work on
>>xml and hence the operations in no.3 above are really fast...
>
> but then, the plain xml data is still stored in a database colum, if I
> understand correctly?
Yep - which to me seems to be the most useful way to store it :)
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-23 13:10:46 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Previous Message | Gregor Zeitlinger | 2003-10-23 11:51:52 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-23 13:10:46 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-10-23 13:09:00 | Re: multi-backend psql |