Re: db encoding

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: db encoding
Date: 2003-10-06 19:05:53
Message-ID: 3F81BD11.8040305@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>About pg_encoding. There is currently no way to tell whether an encoding
>exists. Normally you would put this kind of thing into a system table,
>but doing that is a bit tricky with the encodings. I would like to see
>pg_encoding go, so let's hear what information people need and give them a
>direct way to access it.
>
You need the encoding ID before you have a system to have tables in - while you are running the bootstrap code - unless things change.

That isn't to say that putting the available encodings into a table isn't a good idea, though.

I'm not sure I see anywhere in the docs a ref to what encodings are available, or how to find that out - if I haven't missed it that's something to be remedied.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message markw 2003-10-06 19:15:53 Re: More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-06 18:49:51 Re: Open 7.4 items

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2003-10-06 19:42:27 Re: db encoding
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-06 18:30:47 Re: db encoding