Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of
Date: 2003-09-15 17:29:19
Message-ID: 3F65F6EF.8060205@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>
> 100TB sounds like a lot of backup media and time... Not to mention
> ensuring that the backups will work with available and functioning
> backup hardware.

It is alot but is is not a lot for something like an Insurance company
or a bank. Also 100TB is probably non-compressed although 30TB is still
large.

>
> Head hurts just to think about it,
>
> Link.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abdul-Wahid Paterson 2003-09-15 18:18:07 after postgres upgrade - ERROR: current transaction is aborted
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2003-09-15 16:50:56 Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of Beta 2)