| From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using oids |
| Date: | 2003-09-03 15:46:42 |
| Message-ID: | 3F560CE2.3020004@fireserve.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Why is that, anyway, and why should it be?
Oliver Elphick wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:19, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
>
>>If I were doing it would extract the primary key of each table on startup
>>and then change that one line of code to:
>>
>>os << "SELECT * FROM " << sTable << " WHERE "
>> << prikey << " = currval('" << sTable << "_" << prikey << "_seq')";
>>
>>
>
>You cannot use currval() until you have used nextval() on the same
>sequence in the same session.
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-09-03 15:50:18 | Re: What is the good equivalent for ENUM ? |
| Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-09-03 15:43:37 | Re: Using oids |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2003-09-03 15:59:59 | Re: Win32 native port |
| Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-09-03 15:43:37 | Re: Using oids |