Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases?

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases?
Date: 2003-08-26 18:46:44
Message-ID: 3F4BAB14.8060709@fireserve.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

With the low cost of disks, it might be a good idea to just copy to
disks, that one can put back in.

Greg Stark wrote:

>Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>
>>I run a 24x7x365 db on FreeBSD which has *never* crashed in the 3
>>years it has been in production. Only downtime was the upgrade from
>>PG 7.1 to 7.2 and once for a switchover from RAID5 to RAID10.
>>
>>
>
>I would be interested to know what backup strategy you use for this. Without
>online backups this means that if you had crashed you would have lost data up
>to the last pg_dump you took? Had you done tests to see how long it would have
>taken to restore from the pg_dump?
>
>Online backups with archived transaction logs are the next big killer feature
>(the last one remaining?) for 24x7 operation I think.
>
>
>
>>The DB is currently about 27Mb on disk (including indexes) and
>>processes several million inserts and updates daily, and a few million
>>deletes once every two weeks.
>>
>>
>
>Oh, it's a really small database. That helps a lot with the backup problems of
>24x7 operation. Still I would be interested.
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert L Mathews 2003-08-26 19:48:37 Re: move to usenet?
Previous Message Darko Prenosil 2003-08-26 18:42:27 Re: Fwd: installing postgres7.3.4 problem II