From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Gregory S(dot) Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: is linux ready for databases ? (Ziff Davis article |
Date: | 2003-08-26 17:22:35 |
Message-ID: | 3F4B975B.6080906@fireserve.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yup, me too. Unthought out techspeak.
Mike Mascari wrote:
>Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
>
>
>
>>One of our sysads sent this link ... wondering if there
>>is any comment on it from the world of actual users
>>of linux and a database.
>>
>><http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&ncid=738&e=9&u=/zd/20030825/tc_zd/55311>
>>
>>
>
>I found the following paragraph humorous:
>
>"A key component that needs further development is the threading model
>used by the system kernel, Binstock said. Multithreading is crucial to
>running an enterprise database. Without it, a database would have to
>handle every data query as it comes in, keeping all other queries
>waiting in queue, since the system would be incapable of parallel
>processing."
>
>Mike Mascari
>mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hervé Piedvache | 2003-08-26 17:25:22 | Re: WAL Files checkpoint_timeout with voluminous delete/insert |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-08-26 17:11:41 | Re: [PERFORM] Best tweak for fast results.. ? |