Re: move to usenet?

Hee Hee, but I _**LIKE**_ top quoting.

Greg Stark wrote:

>Oh the irony.
>
>"Chris M" <chris(at)none(dot)none> writes:
>
>
>
>>I use outlook express to visit news.postgresql.org now.
>>It works well.
>>
>>"David W Noon" <dwnoon(at)spamtrap(dot)ntlworld(dot)com>
>>news:1od911-17s(dot)ln1(at)my-pc(dot)ntlworld(dot)com(dot)(dot)(dot)
>>
>>
>>>On Tuesday 19 Aug 2003 09:06 in
>>><20030819080727(dot)22F781CB1D0(at)koshin(dot)dsl(dot)systemec(dot)nl>, Jules Alberts
>>>(jules(dot)alberts(at)arbodienst-limburg(dot)nl) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>This is not a troll and I certainly don't want to start a holy war but
>>>>wouldn't it be a good idea to move the postgresql lists from the
>>>>mailing list approach to usenet?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I don't know about anybody else, but I am already reading these messages
>>>from a Usenet newsserver. I do not receive them as e-mail.
>>>
>>>I agree that many messages are not formatted according to Usenet
>>>conventions, but I normally attribute that to Windows users who know
>>>nothing about the Internet. Thus, top-posting and full-quoting are rife
>>>
>>>
>>all
>>
>>
>>>across Usenet.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Dave [RLU#314465]
>>>======================================================
>>>dwnoon(at)spamtrap(dot)ntlworld(dot)com (David W Noon)
>>>Remove spam trap to reply via e-mail.
>>>======================================================
>>>
>>>
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>