Re: doc patch - linux memory handling

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc patch - linux memory handling
Date: 2003-08-22 16:17:43
Message-ID: 3F464227.2090103@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


It appears we are back in the "you need a non-empty password" mode.

Anyway, here's the revised patch.

andrew

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
> I didn't find a single instance of a <warning> tag in the doc sources.
> I did find a warning in an unadorned para, in func.sgml.
>
> Anyway, I made the changes (using <note>) but anoncvs is now refusing
> my login attempt, so I can't do the diff.
>
> I've spent way too much time on this already - really my only concern
> was that the docs would give people info that would make things worse
> rather than better, and nobody else was doing anything about it.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
kern-doc-patch2 text/plain 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-08-22 17:13:14 Re: doc patch - linux memory handling
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-22 15:45:10 Re: doc patch - linux memory handling