| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Buglist |
| Date: | 2003-08-22 15:08:56 |
| Message-ID: | 3F463208.6030902@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Another way to give autovacuum some hints would be to return some number
> as commandtuples from vacuum. like the number of tuples actually
> vacuumed. That together with the new number of reltuples in pg_class
> will tell autovacuum how frequent a relation really needs scanning.
Which actually would be much better because it'd work without the
statistics collector configured for gathering IO stats.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-08-22 15:16:50 | Re: Stored procedure advice needed |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-08-22 15:03:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Buglist |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-22 15:11:25 | Re: [SQL] "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-08-22 15:03:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Buglist |