| From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" |
| Date: | 2003-08-21 14:18:28 |
| Message-ID: | 3F45220C.1385.144CB66@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 21 Aug 2003 at 9:21, Greg Stark wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>
> > Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >
> > >On 21 Aug 2003 at 0:22, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > >
> > >>* DDL
> > >>- Data definition language (table creation statements etc.) in MySQL
> > >>are not transaction based and cannot be rolled back.
> > >
> > > Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs? oracle seems to
> > > have autonomous transactions which is arthogonal.
> > >
> > M$ SQL2000 has (and previous versions had too, I believe)
Any pointers to documentation?
Bye
Shridhar
--
divorce, n: A change of wife.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-21 14:18:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2003-08-21 13:21:01 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-21 14:18:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-21 13:36:39 | Re: query optimization: aggregate and distinct |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-21 14:18:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" |
| Previous Message | Jon Jensen | 2003-08-21 14:03:27 | Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit |