| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" |
| Date: | 2003-08-21 10:30:58 |
| Message-ID: | 3F449F62.7020107@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
>On 21 Aug 2003 at 0:22, Ian Barwick wrote:
>
>
>>* DDL
>>- Data definition language (table creation statements etc.) in MySQL
>>are not transaction based and cannot be rolled back.
>>
>>
>
>Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs? oracle seems to
>have autonomous transactions which is arthogonal.
>
M$ SQL2000 has (and previous versions had too, I believe)
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-08-21 13:05:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-21 09:15:03 | Re: Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David W Noon | 2003-08-21 11:08:33 | Re: move to usenet? |
| Previous Message | Jason Godden | 2003-08-21 10:22:15 | Re: Bulk Insert / Update / Delete OR... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-08-21 13:05:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list |
| Previous Message | Dani Oderbolz | 2003-08-21 10:05:14 | Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b |