Re: ext3 block size

From: DeJuan Jackson <djackson(at)speedfc(dot)com>
To: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb(at)eskimo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ext3 block size
Date: 2003-08-07 16:36:28
Message-ID: 3F32800C.2040101@speedfc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

It was RH8 where I saw the issues. It was so bad that I had one server
freeze 20 minutes after reboot. And it wasn't a hardware issue; that
server is now running with several months of uptime under heavy load.

Jonathan Bartlett wrote:

>What distribution are you running? I and a lot of other people use RH8 on
>multiprocesor boxes, and it works great!
>
>Jon
>
>On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, DeJuan Jackson wrote:
>
>
>
>>Don't know the answer to your question, but I thought I would just pipe
>>in and say that if this is an SMP (has multiple processors) Linux box
>>you don't want to use ext3!!!
>>
>>I used ext3 on my SMP box here at work and now I can't have children (I
>>guess it would help if I got a wife first)!!
>>But in all seriousness SMP + ext3 = BAD(unpredictable crashes depending
>>loosely related to system load).
>>
>>
>>Wilson A. Galafassi Jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>hello.
>>>my database size is 5GB. what is the block size recommend?
>>>thanks
>>>wilson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2003-08-07 17:13:39 Re: Tsearch2 custom dictionaries
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-07 16:16:09 Re: cannot open multi-query plan as cursor