From: | Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Rich Cullingford <rculling(at)sysd(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Brian Lindauer <lindauer(at)sysd(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: SSL support in PG 7.4 |
Date: | 2003-08-07 02:18:47 |
Message-ID: | 3F31B707.3060706@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Tom,
In general that may be true. And I didn't into this very much at the
time I did my initial v3 protocol work. But in glancing at the code
just now, it needs to at least correctly handle a v3 style error
response from an ssl handshake request, no? So some work needs to be
done. But it may be the case that if you have a successfull handshake
the code will work as is.
thanks,
--Barry
Tom Lane wrote:
> Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
>
>>The SSL support is in 7.4, but it is currently broken. Actually I think
>>it might work against a 7.3 database, but won't work against a 7.4
>>database with the v3 FE/BE protocol. It worked up until the v3 protocol
>>changes were put in, and I haven't had time to go back and fix it up.
>
>
> I'm surprised that the protocol changes would have affected SSL support
> --- the SSL wrapper goes on, or not, before we do anything
> protocol-version-specific. Do you recall exactly what is the
> interaction?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2003-08-07 02:33:10 | Re: Asynchronous NOTIFY available? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-07 00:09:51 | Re: SSL support in PG 7.4 |