Re: an aggregate array function

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: an aggregate array function
Date: 2003-07-29 16:02:46
Message-ID: 3F269AA6.7090200@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


It's in the SQL99 standard. There's nothing forcing you to use them - I
am a (possibly) old-fashioned data architect, so I never use them ;-)

SQL99 actually allows you to use more or less arbitrary composite types
as columns (although Pg currently doesn't) - many would argue that this
violates first normal form. OTOH there's probably a good case to make
that all this is necessary to provide good support to ObjectRelational
mappings, and other OO stuff.

andrew

Dani Oderbolz wrote:

> I got another question to this:
> why does PostgreSQL support Arrays in the first place?
> For my taste, its a very messy concept...
>
> Regards,
> Dani
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-07-29 16:06:35 Re: FATAL message on Linux
Previous Message Michael Brusser 2003-07-29 15:52:49 FATAL message on Linux