Re: '_' < '5' -- different answer on 7.2 and 7.3

From: David Blasby <dblasby(at)refractions(dot)net>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: '_' < '5' -- different answer on 7.2 and 7.3
Date: 2003-07-04 23:00:40
Message-ID: 3F060718.3040902@refractions.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> My first guess would be that you're not running in "C" locale
> on the 7.3 system. I get false on my 7.3.1 system in C locale,
> but if I compare the two strings in C using en_US for example I
> seem to get results like the above ('_'<'5' is true).

It turns out our 7.3 database was somehow initd with local "en_US".

I'm trying to get postgresql and a MS vc++ to communicate.

In postgresql 7.3 (en_US):

toponymy=# select '_' < '5';;
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)

toponymy=# select '_5' < '5';
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)

But in MS vc++:

TRACE("locale set to 'en_US'\n");
setlocale( LC_ALL, "English_United States" );
if (strcoll("_5","5") <0 )
TRACE("strcoll('_5','5') -- <0 \n");
else
TRACE( "strcoll('_5','5') -- >=0\n");

returns:
locale set to 'en_US'
strcoll('_5','5') -- <0

Which is to say postgresql thinks "_5" > "5", but
(a bit strangely) "_" < "5" (the '>' and '<' are reversed).

vc++ thinks "_5" < "5" and "_" < "5".

So, which one is correct and why does the other disagree?

dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-07-04 23:34:31 Re: '_' < '5' -- different answer on 7.2 and 7.3
Previous Message Bjoern Metzdorf 2003-07-04 22:24:18 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL