Re: array support patch phase 1 patch

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Date: 2003-06-02 04:46:10
Message-ID: 3EDAD692.40804@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> That would mask the problem for ANALYZE, but not for anything else.
>
> Whether there is anything else I'm not sure, but I can't say I feel
> comfortable about that answer.
>

What if we modify equality_oper() and friends to do the check for us
when argtype is a varlena array?

If an array type is checked for an ordering operator, its element type
now *must* have an ordering operator in order for the result to be
meaningful. Same goes for ordering_oper().

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-02 04:52:02 Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-02 04:27:53 Re: psql: tab completion for \encoding