| From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Network Administrator <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Guy Fraser <guy(at)incentre(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2003-04-15 18:56:16 |
| Message-ID: | 3E9C55D0.4050909@cvc.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
I heard that the debian rev system is MUCH better, but never got accepted
because of the market weight of RH. Is this so?
Network Administrator wrote:
> When you say "forces upgrades" what do you mean?
>
> I might do things differently- I download the tarball, compile, dump and restore
> my system. I've never have Postgres **not** compile on my Slackware boxes but
> I've had **tons** of issues with RPM disto's (I've consulted on RedHat &
> Mandrake personally) with even smaller packages things so I don't use it much.
>
> Seems to me you should **always** be able to compile software.
>
> -$0.02
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Benoit | 2003-04-15 18:56:50 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
| Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-04-15 18:55:14 | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Benoit | 2003-04-15 18:56:50 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
| Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-04-15 18:55:14 | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL |