From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Win32 port patches submitted |
Date: | 2003-01-21 18:03:09 |
Message-ID: | 3E2D8B5C.E2F5C9A4@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > I don't see a strong reason not
> > to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
> > requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
> > shell environment.
>
> Indeed. I think the goal here is to have a port that *runs* in native
> Windows; but I see no reason not to require Cygwin for *building* it.
Agreed.
We focused on porting the programs. The goal was to have PostgreSQL
running native on Win32 for a user. Having a nice and easy maintainable
cross platform config, build and test environment for the developers is
definitely something that still needs to be done (hint, hint).
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Al Sutton | 2003-01-21 18:06:26 | Re: [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-21 17:51:08 | Re: Win32 port patches submitted |