| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and readline |
| Date: | 2003-01-09 14:46:49 |
| Message-ID: | 3E1D8B59.9030102@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dan Langille wrote:
<snip>
> As this is changing existing behaviour, I think adding an optional
> switch to revert to the old behaviour is a good idea.
Two thoughts:
a) Is it possible to change the behavior of the history as we're
discussing? Haven't heard Peter's response to this.
b) Do we really want to go to the effort of adding a switch to revert to
previous behaviour for something like this? It's almost definitely a
win to have \e commands appear in the history, and seems a bit to
trivial for adding switches for.
?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2003-01-09 14:50:03 | Re: psql and readline |
| Previous Message | John Liu | 2003-01-09 14:39:33 | clock sync |