Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Chris Boget <chris(at)wild(dot)net>
Cc: David Garamond <davegaramond(at)icqmail(dot)com>, "j(dot)random(dot)programmer" <javadesigner(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
Date: 2002-12-04 14:20:22
Message-ID: 3DEE0F26.20400@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Chris Boget wrote:
>>>4) The auto-increment ("serial") fields are very
>>>badly documented.
>>
>>since you came from the mysql world, this is understandable. mysql
>>doesn't have a "serial". it only has "autoincrement field." a
>>convenience, at best. not very flexible.
>
>
> What's the difference between the two? Autoincrement and serial?
> Unless I missed something in the docs, it didn't appear that there
> was any difference.

Hi Chris,

Do you have the ability to view Flash presentations?

If so, then serial/sequences are pretty well illustrated here:

http://techdocs.postgresql.org/college/001_sequences/index.php

Hope that helps.

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-04 14:21:44 Re: pg_relcheck gone from 7.3?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-04 14:09:46 Re: Segmentation fault in 7.3