Re: precision of numeric type

From: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: "w(dot)winter" <w(dot)winter(at)logitags(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: precision of numeric type
Date: 2002-10-29 16:53:24
Message-ID: 3DBEBD04.7000503@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Wolfgang,

w.winter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on testing our auto-configuration persistence framework ACP against
> PostgreSQL we found the following problem:
>
> I have a table with a column of type numeric(48,10). The PostgreSQL docs
> say: "The type numeric can store numbers of practically unlimited size and
> precision, while being able to store all numbers and carry out all
> calculations exactly."

This is true.

>
> I store the Double value 1212121234.5634349876 with a
> PreparedStatement.setDouble()
>

But the problem is that java Double isn't able to perform calculations
exactly. If you want exact precision you should be using the BigDecimal
datatype (and getBigDecimal/setBigDecimal). BigDecimal is the logical
java data type that corresponds to the numeric type in postgres.

thanks,
--Barry

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2002-10-29 16:55:14 Re: DatabaseMetaData.getTables() problem
Previous Message Barry Lind 2002-10-29 16:45:17 Re: executeBatch problem