Re: 'epoch'::timestamp and Daylight Savings

> We have just upgraded from 7.1.3 to 7.2.3 over the weekend, and have just
> noticed something weird with regards 'epoch'::timestamp.
> In 7.1.3, 'epoch'::timestamp always returned the value 1970-01-01
> 00:00:00+00,...

I would expect 'epoch'::timestamp to always act as though the value were
the same as Unix time zero. But it did not explicitly return that value:

lockhart=# select version();
-------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 7.1.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96

lockhart=# select 'epoch'::timestamp;
----------
epoch

lockhart=# select 'epoch'::timestamp + '0 sec'::interval;
------------------------
1969-12-31 16:00:00-08

> following the upgrade we now get:-
> timestamptz
> ------------------------
> 1970-01-01 01:00:00+01

Which is consistant with the previous result in absolute time.

You will find that the most recent versions of PostgreSQL convert
'epoch' on input, and that with- and without time zone data types are
available:

lockhart=# select cast('epoch' as timestamp with time zone);
timestamptz
------------------------
1969-12-31 16:00:00-08

lockhart=# select cast('epoch' as timestamp without time zone);
timestamp
---------------------
1970-01-01 00:00:00

> Also, any fields set to 'epoch'::timestamp before the upgrade now return:-
> e_app_xfer_date
> ------------------------
> 1970-01-01 00:00:00+01
> If we issue a SET TIMEZONE TO 'GMT' the results are the same as for the
> previous release.

Not sure about this one. What is the schema? Can you give an example
where the time gets shifted by an hour?

> This is causing us a problem as we use epoch to indicate whether the data
> has been processed, and to log the date and time of processing.

Using "special values" to indicate status can be troublesome, as you are
finding. I'd suggest using NULL to indicate that a field is not known or
not yet set.

> This email and any files attached to it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.

Oops. Can you please confirm that we were the intended recipients? ;)

hth

- Thomas