From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Erwan DUROSELLE <EDuroselle(at)seafrance(dot)fr> |
Cc: | itvthor(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org, kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hot Backup |
Date: | 2002-10-08 14:04:40 |
Message-ID: | 3DA2E5F8.EA496ADD@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi Erwan,
Erwan DUROSELLE wrote:
<snip>
> As someone said, Replication may be a way to reduce the risks.
Yes, it can, but it all depends on how much the data is worth, what kind
of load happens, etc.
Something as simple as a master->slave replication setup will do,
because the master would generally be the beefy box doing processing,
and the slave database server only receives changes, etc.
Useful for lots of circumstances, although not the only solution.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> E.D.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Erwan DUROSELLE // SEAFRANCE DSI
> Responsable Bases de Données // Databases Manager
> Tel: +33 (0)1 55 31 59 70 // Fax: +33 (0)1 55 31 85 28
> email: eduroselle(at)seafrance(dot)fr
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-10-08 14:08:45 | Re: Rép. : Re: Hot Backup |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2002-10-08 14:04:29 | Re: pg_dump command inside shell scripts |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Curtis Faith | 2002-10-08 14:15:30 | Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes |
Previous Message | Curtis Faith | 2002-10-08 14:00:06 | Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes |