| From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup |
| Date: | 2002-10-08 05:47:18 |
| Message-ID: | 3DA2BEBE.26020.13D2582A@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 7 Oct 2002 at 13:48, Neil Conway wrote:
> "Sandeep Chadha" <sandeep(at)newnetco(dot)com> writes:
> > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgres
> > 7.3b2 and still don't see any archive's flushed to any other
> > place. Please let me know how is hot backup procedure implemented in
> > current 7.3 beta(2) release.
> AFAIK no such hot backup feature has been implemented for 7.3 -- you
> appear to have been misinformed.
Is replication an answer to hot backup?
Bye
Shridhar
--
ink, n.: A villainous compound of tannogallate of iron, gum-arabic, and water,
chiefly used to facilitate the infection of idiocy and promote intellectual
crime. -- H.L. Mencken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-08 05:49:21 | Re: Efficient date range search? |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-08 05:44:11 | Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2002-10-08 07:20:47 | Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-08 05:44:11 | Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance |