| From: | "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Mike Sosteric <mikes(at)athabascau(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] arrays |
| Date: | 2002-09-30 15:59:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3D983C90.7277.7FF06CB4@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On 30 Sep 2002 at 8:54, Josh Berkus wrote:
> As such, I'd reccommend one of two approaches for you:
>
> 1) Post some of your schema ideas here, and let us show you how they
> are better done relationally. The relational data model has 30 years
> of thought behind it -- it can solve a lot of problems.
Mike,
Just in case you or others think Josh is some crazed lunatic[1] who
doesn't know what he's talking about, I support his views on this
topic. Avoid arrays. Normalize your data.
[1] - Actually, I don't think I know anything about Josh, except that
he's right about normalizing your data.
--
Dan Langille
I'm looking for a computer job:
http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-30 16:09:12 | Re: [GENERAL] arrays |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-09-30 15:54:31 | Re: [GENERAL] arrays |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-30 16:09:12 | Re: [GENERAL] arrays |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-09-30 15:54:31 | Re: [GENERAL] arrays |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-30 16:09:12 | Re: [GENERAL] arrays |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-09-30 15:54:31 | Re: [GENERAL] arrays |