Re: pg_views.definition

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_views.definition
Date: 2002-07-16 17:05:00
Message-ID: 3D34523C.56511FD4@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Auto reconstruction of a view based on its original textual definition
> is still potentially interesting, but I submit that it won't necessarily
> always give the right answer.

Sure, it's another bullet to shoot yourself into someone elses foot.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-16 17:07:43 Re: pg_views.definition
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-16 16:31:49 Re: [SQL] line datatype