Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
Cc: builder <sarah(dot)fraser(at)cnet(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2002-07-12 14:05:26
Message-ID: 3D2EE226.83951D5C@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

...
> Not many Web developers use PostgreSQL because they feel that
> the additional features degrade performance.

"Not many web developers" is a completely subjective statement which has
no basis in fact. How many is "not many"? Is that two? One hundred? Two
million? Twenty million?

How many is "many web developers"? Must be more than "not many", eh?
Probably can't narrow it down much beyond that :/

Hmm. Given the proven performance scaling benefits from Postgres, one
could also say "not many web developers feel that their applications
need to scale beyond 5 simultaneous users". Or "not many web developers
need transaction-enabled databases", or ???

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message terry 2002-07-12 14:13:47 Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2002-07-12 14:01:18 Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from