From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Ed Loehr <ed(at)LoehrTech(dot)com>, dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy(at)opushealthcare(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: implementing query timeout |
Date: | 2002-07-10 23:39:49 |
Message-ID: | 3D2CC5C5.421C19BB@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > Here is my first draft of a query timeout SET variable.
> >
> > Unless it only cancels SELECT statements (which may or may not be a good
> > idea), please call it statement_timeout.
>
> Do people prefer query_timeout or statement_timeout? Doesn't matter to
> me.
Statements is everything. DDL- and DML-statements. Query is IMHO synonym
for DML-statement. So query_timeout is the right term.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sugita | 2002-07-11 01:31:26 | Re: install-sh patch for Mac OS X |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-07-10 23:36:02 | Re: implementing query timeout |