Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joe Conway writes:
>
>>I was hoping it would be acceptable to leave this function in (as well
>>as the one to get the number of config variables),
>
> Why? I thought the SRF can have arbitrary termination actions, so we do
> you need to count them in advance?
>
Well, call it convenience, but num_guc_variables is used throughout
guc.c, so it seemed consistent and reliable to use as a termination action.
Joe