Re: PostgreSQL SQL92: CORRESPONDING BY

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David H(dot) Johnson" <dhj(at)uab(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL SQL92: CORRESPONDING BY
Date: 2002-06-19 05:50:21
Message-ID: 3D101B9D.ACDE662E@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I received this via private email. Do we want CORRESPONDING added to
> the TODO list?

Sure. Though since we now have features.sgml which has the complete set
of SQL99 itemized features we perhaps should shrink the ToDo entries
regarding SQL99 features to only one:

"Support additional SQL99 features"

Anything more specific which does not itemize all the features which we
might want to see implemented probably does not help. And carrying the
list in two places is more trouble than it is worth imho.

I've been working on separating the current single list of features into
"Supported" and "Unsupported" lists; will commit a first cut this
evening. Look in

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/features.html

for the most recent version available. I estimate that we have about two
thirds of the feature set implemented. I'm looking at implementing some
of them as (almost) trivial improvements or changes to our syntax; I've
got CREATE CAST... as one of the first ones to do.

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-19 05:55:08 Re: pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.y
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-06-19 05:26:37 Re: pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.y