Re: Sum

From: Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)nsd(dot)ca>
To: Jim Martinez <jjm(at)bigbigorg(dot)org>
Cc: Marcelo Pereira <gandalf(at)sum(dot)desktop(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sum
Date: 2002-03-28 18:21:05
Message-ID: 3CA35F11.852DEADF@nsd.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Maybe our resident expert on SQL standard, Tom Lane, would care to
answer this one.

Jim Martinez wrote:
>
> After much thought on Mar 28 Jean-Luc Lachance wrote:
>
> > Marcelo,
> >
> > Assuming that "cod" is unique and sequencial, you can use the following:
> >
> > SELECT *, ( SELECT SUM( value) from table as t2 where t2.cod <= t1.cod)
> > as running_total
> > FROM table as t1
> > ORDER BY cod;
> >
> > jll
> >
>
> Subqueries outside of the where clause are great! I hadn't come accross
> them when working with the more well advertised database products.
>
> Are they SQL9x compliant? I try to develop using non postgres specific
> tools when I can.
>
> Jim

In response to

  • Re: Sum at 2002-03-28 17:43:21 from Jim Martinez

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Davi Leal 2002-03-28 18:24:57 NOTIFY tableX, LISTEN tableX, pool Nofities()
Previous Message Riebs, Andy 2002-03-28 18:09:44 Re: Performance Tuning Document?