| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Date: | 2002-01-22 02:41:59 |
| Message-ID: | 3C4CD177.8040805@pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus wrote:
> OpenACS is GPL'd ...
I should point out that we inherited GPL'd code, thus "which license"
isn't an issue. If someone asks me why we don't use the BSD license I
have a very simple answer for them.
Which should be the case with PG. The original authors released it
under the Berkely license and "which license" shouldn't be an issue. I
still don't understand why more needs to be said. If people are too
clueless to understand this, let them remain clueless and ignore them.
IMHO, that is.
--
Don Baccus
Portland, OR
http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-01-22 02:59:45 | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2002-01-22 02:32:53 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-01-22 02:59:45 | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2002-01-22 02:32:53 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |