Re: Is It Too Big ? - Customer Data Warehouse Growth

From: Steve Wampler <swampler(at)noao(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Mark kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: Is It Too Big ? - Customer Data Warehouse Growth
Date: 2002-01-17 14:47:34
Message-ID: 3C46E406.1D4C58B4@noao.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
>

> I seem to recall having heard that Linux has some ~100GB restriction on
> the size of a single filesystem, which could be a problem. That might
> be obsolete information, but be sure to check max filesystem size for
> whichever kernel you select.
>

I don't think Linux does, though some filesystems might:

->uname -a
Linux tapycer 2.4.5 #2 SMP Mon Jun 18 16:09:41 MST 2001 i686 unknown
->df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/pool/pool0 366529628 1318912 365210716 0% /mnt/san1
/dev/pool/pool1 96442588 7028276 89414312 7% /mnt/san2
/dev/pool/pool2 145972564 21280320 124692244 15% /mnt/san3

These are all GFS filesystems (www.sistina.com) located on a SAN.

--
Steve Wampler -- swampler(at)noao(dot)edu
O sibile, si ergo. Fortibus es enaro.
Nobile, demis trux. Demis phulla causan dux.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-17 14:51:19 Re: pg_dump behaviour changed in 7.1.3?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-01-17 14:33:18 Re: Is It Too Big ? - Customer Data Warehouse Growth Projection