Re: Meaning of vacuum output

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Meaning of vacuum output
Date: 2002-01-17 02:47:26
Message-ID: 3C463B3E.9ECFC71C@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> > I shut down all connections, and vacuum has a different output:
>
> > NOTICE: Pages 33639: Changed 226, Empty 0; Tup 128819: Vac 2840812,
> > Keep 0, UnUsed 96275.
> > Total CPU 14.29s/28.69u sec elapsed 233.02 sec.
>
> Ah-hah, you did have open transactions.
>
> > So I conclude from these two data points that Keep means tuples that are
> > still visible to a transaction, Vac means tuples that are not visible to
> > any transaction. But, what is UnUsed?
>
> Looking at the code:
>
> Tup # tuples remaining after vacuum
> Vac # tuples removed by vacuum
> Keep # dead tuples kept because some xact can still see 'em
> Unused # unused item pointers
>
> "Keep" is included in the "Tup" total.
>
> The unused item pointers may get recycled later; it looks like that
> hasn't been determined yet at the point where these stats are printed.

I think this explanation would be worth mentioning in the documentation
for the VACUUM command (maybe as OUTPUT?).

???

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-01-17 02:58:11 Re: large number of files open...
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-01-17 02:34:45 Re: [HACKERS] [ANNOUNCE] Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is