Re: timestamp resolution?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp resolution?
Date: 2001-10-04 05:48:14
Message-ID: 3BBBF81E.C3EA31C7@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Is this an expected behavior? I could not see why t1 and t2 are
> showing different time resolutions...

Even stranger, this only happens on the first call to CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
after starting a backend (example below), and stays that way if I just
do "select current_timestamp". Something must not be initialized quite
right, but I don't know what. Any guesses?

- Thomas

(backend already connected and have just dropped t1)

thomas=# create table t1 (d1 timestamp(2), d2 timestamp(2) default
current_timestamp);
CREATE
thomas=# insert into t1 values (current_timestamp);
INSERT 16572 1
thomas=# select * from t1;
d1 | d2
---------------------------+---------------------------
2001-10-04 05:37:12.09+00 | 2001-10-04 05:37:12.09+00
(1 row)

thomas=# \q
myst$ psql
...
thomas=# insert into t1 values (current_timestamp);
INSERT 16573 1
thomas=# select * from t1;
d1 | d2
---------------------------+---------------------------
2001-10-04 05:37:12.09+00 | 2001-10-04 05:37:12.09+00
2001-10-04 05:37:40+00 | 2001-10-04 05:37:39.72+00
(2 rows)

thomas=# insert into t1 values (current_timestamp);
INSERT 16574 1
thomas=# select * from t1;
d1 | d2
---------------------------+---------------------------
2001-10-04 05:37:12.09+00 | 2001-10-04 05:37:12.09+00
2001-10-04 05:37:40+00 | 2001-10-04 05:37:39.72+00
2001-10-04 05:38:08.33+00 | 2001-10-04 05:38:08.33+00
(3 rows)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2001-10-04 06:34:01 Re: My last ECPG commit
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-10-04 04:51:11 timestamp resolution?