| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql/src backend/access/transam/xact.c backen ... |
| Date: | 2001-09-29 08:44:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3BB589F5.CF59DC8B@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
> I'm seeing the following failure in the rules regress test:
...
> The actual result corresponds to the former output, and is indeed what
> I would expect, given that text_timestamp() is (and should be)
> non-cachable. Are you sure this expected file is correct?
It was, when I had marked that function as cachable. I went through the
catalog one last time and changed it back (apparently).
> I'm also seeing rather massive failures in horology, but this evidently
> is because horology-no-DST-before-1970.out hasn't been updated ...
Right. I've got one failure in horology myself, since one test was
sensitive to DST and has a transition which apparently happened last
night!
Both should be fixed now. Or would be if cvs.postgresql.org was
responding to requests for ssh. I've enclosed a patch file to be
applied, if you would like to do the honors.
I don't have the right kind of box to be able to test horology for the
"pre1970 crowd" myself, so others will have to do it.
- Thomas
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| datetime.patches | text/plain | 7.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tgl | 2001-09-29 15:17:43 | pgsql/src/test/regress expected/horology-no-DS ... |
| Previous Message | inoue | 2001-09-29 07:57:58 | pgsql/src include/nodes/execnodes.h backend/ex ... |