From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | andy <andy(at)exkom(dot)co(dot)za> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JAVA vs PERL : PERL wins to postgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-09-04 04:12:40 |
Message-ID: | 3B9454B8.8090808@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Andy,
I would be interesting in knowing what version you did this test on,
what platform, and most importantly which JDK (and if the Sun JDK which
JVM: classic, hotspot client, hotspot server).
thanks,
--Barry
andy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran a few bench marks on JAVA writing to a postgreSQL table using and
> found that for the same number of records added to the table as a
> similar PERL routine the following results :
> PERL 39 seconds : JAVA 45 Seconds.
> In a similar experiment where PERL and JAVA did treir output to the
> screen and not to a table,
>
> JAVA took 3 seconds and PERL 310 Seconds.
> My conclusion is that the database driver to postgreSQL is still far
> from efficient in the JAVA implementation.
>
> Both tests were run on the same computer.
>
> I would appreciate your comments and suggestions.
> Andy Sewell
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-04 04:40:41 | Re: Re: Unterminated quoted string error. |
Previous Message | Ian Wehrman | 2001-09-04 03:01:17 | jdbc ResultSetMetaData::isWritable() |