Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CURRENT OF cursor without OIDs
Date: 2001-08-09 04:15:33
Message-ID: 3B720E65.41A458EF@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Hmm is there any place setting proc->xmin other than
> > the following ?
>
> > [in storage/ipc/sinval.c]
> > if (serializable)
> > MyProc->xmin = snapshot->xmin;
>
> AFAICT that's the only place that sets it. It's cleared to zero during
> transaction commit or abort in xact.c.
>

You are right.
Now I understand I've completely misunderstood
'NOTICE: Child itemid in update-chain marked as unused - can't
continue repair_frag'.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-08-09 05:06:56 Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-09 03:01:14 Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?