From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net |
Cc: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'PostgreSQL jdbc list'" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
Date: | 2001-06-25 20:03:21 |
Message-ID: | 3B379909.6080302@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
I like that idea. Best of both worlds. I will redo my patch to do that
and resubmit.
thanks,
--Barry
Dave Cramer wrote:
> Bruce, Barry,
>
> How about checking for the existence of the date object in the
> constructor? This would mean that it would only be created once per
> thread.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: June 25, 2001 2:50 PM
> To: Barry Lind
> Cc: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net; 'PostgreSQL jdbc list'
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
>
>
>>Bruce,
>>
>>I don't think you need to back out Dave's patch. It works fine as it
>>is. I just think it can be improved upon.
>>
>
> OK, you just let me know.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-25 21:43:01 | Re: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-25 19:53:35 | RE: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-25 21:43:01 | Re: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-25 19:53:35 | RE: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-25 21:43:01 | Re: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-25 19:53:35 | RE: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |