shared temp tables

From: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: shared temp tables
Date: 2001-06-20 11:47:31
Message-ID: 3B308D53.9303D3A8@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I love the fact that temp tables do not exist in every PostgreSQL session,
don't get me wrong.

The issue is this: most "web environments" have the idea of a session. A
session management scheme based on PostgreSQL exposes PostgreSQL's worst
behavior. Small amount of records, high update/delete rate for each record. So
much so, that it probably isn't realistic to replace something like Oracle with
PostgreSQL in this environment.

Do "temp tables" suffer the same delete/update behavior of marking the row as
deleted and adding another row? Thus requiring vacuum periodically.

If not, should/could there be a way to create a temp table that is globally
visible?

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Pilosov 2001-06-20 11:58:08 statically linked PL's
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2001-06-20 11:38:03 Re: