From: | Thomas Swan <tswan-lst(at)ics(dot)olemiss(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "P(dot) Dwayne Miller" <dmiller(at)espgroup(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Primary Key |
Date: | 2001-06-19 22:37:58 |
Message-ID: | 3B2FD446.9060506@ics.olemiss.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>After fixing the several obvious syntax errors, it works fine for me:
>
>regression=# CREATE TABLE message
>regression-# (
>regression(# msgid int4 not null,
>regression(# msgtext text,
>regression(# CONSTRAINT cons_001_pk PRIMARY KEY (msgid)
>regression(# );
>NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'cons_001_pk' for table 'message'
>CREATE
>regression=# \d message
> Table "message"
> Attribute | Type | Modifier
>-----------+---------+----------
> msgid | integer | not null
> msgtext | text |
>Primary Key: cons_001_pk
>
>regression=#
>
>Is Cold Fusion perhaps doing strange things to the query behind your
>back? None of those CREATE TABLE commands are legal SQL according
>to my references.
>
I've been using the syntax "PRIMARY KEY (/column_name/ [, /column_name/
])," without the constraint name, and the "/COLUMN_NAME TYPE/ PRIMARY
KEY" syntax for sometime now. I may be admitting to SQL heresy in
saying that; but, that's the syntax I've seen in MySQL and in quite a
few SQL/database books.
AFIAK, it's a legal table creation statement.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-19 22:50:39 | Re: Primary Key |
Previous Message | P. Dwayne Miller | 2001-06-19 22:11:12 | Re: Primary Key |