Re: pg_index.isclustered can work

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_index.isclustered can work
Date: 2001-05-15 10:36:53
Message-ID: 3B0106C5.A8005959@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

[snip]

>
> FYI, the reference to pg_index.indisclustered in ODBC was assuming it
> meant it was a hash index,

Hmm where could I see it ?

> which is just plain wrong, so that code is
> not coming back.
>

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-05-15 10:40:08 Re: Re: Internet is putting lot of competition fire & heat under Microsoft SQL Server
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-05-15 10:10:22 AW: pg_index.indislossy