Re: A problem with pg_dump?

From: Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A problem with pg_dump?
Date: 2001-05-03 15:43:55
Message-ID: 3AF17CBB.31E9282C@albourne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Current CVS pg_dump (grab the nightly snapshot if you don't use CVS,
> or wait for 7.1.1 in a day or two) is alleged to be able to work
> against a 7.0 database. Give it a try.

That would be great, I had plans to wait for 7.1.1 anyway.

Thanks

--
Alessio F. Bragadini alessio(at)albourne(dot)com
APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-2-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-05-03 15:49:27 Re: \c connects as another user instead I want in psql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-03 15:42:18 Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems