Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...
Date: 2001-04-29 05:02:08
Message-ID: 3AEBA050.36DC7D19@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Totally agreed.

It could just be from a lack of people's time to do things, or I wonder
if Alfred's patch is doing things which might not be beneficial?
(Maybe there have been decisions on a better way to get it done, but it
just hasn't been implemented yet).

I'm curious also.

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz wrote:
>
> I am rather staggered by a developer considering it necessary to
> attempt to cooerce the core development team into including a patch.
>
> If the work that Alfred has done is as effective as he claims, then
> there must be a *REALLY* good reason why it isn't being included.
>
> I don't want to start any form of war....
> But as a user I'd be interested to know why such a patch would appear
> to be unacceptable.
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Glen Eustace,
> GodZone Internet Services, a division of AGRE Enterprises Ltd.,
> P.O. Box 8020, Palmerston North, New Zealand 5301
> Ph/Fax: +64 6 357 8168, Mob: +64 21 424 015
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Waugh 2001-04-29 05:04:18 Re: Re: crypt(table.field) ?
Previous Message Jeff Meeks 2001-04-29 00:42:17 Joining more than 2 tables