Re: must I create the function check_primary_key ?

From: "Peter J(dot) Schoenster" <peter(at)schoenster(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: must I create the function check_primary_key ?
Date: 2001-04-26 15:58:59
Message-ID: 3AE7F163.15642.11DD19@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Peter J. Schoenster wrote:
>
> > I want to use this referential integrity etc. that I've never used
..snip..
> > CREATE TRIGGER employer_id_exists
> > BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON company_profile FOR EACH
> > ROW
> > EXECUTE PROCEDURE check_primary_key('employer_id',
> > 'employer_profile', 'employer_id');

Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
enlightened me as such:

> You probably just want to use a REFERENCES constraint
> employer_id int4 REFERENCES employer_profile(employer_id)
>
> You'll need to have a primary key or unique constraint
> on employer_profile(employer_id). The references constraint
> will also prevent you from deleting a employer_id
> row that is being referenced.

Banging my head on the table ... yes ... I never set the constraint
on employer_id in employer_profile. I should have been more
patient in reading the error message returned by psql.

Thanks for the help. Your suggestion worked as expected.

Peter
All idioms must be learned.
Good idioms only need to be learned once.
--Alan Cooper

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenn Thompson 2001-04-26 16:14:27 Re: realising a counter in an pgpsql-trigger
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-04-26 15:44:47 Re: simulate union in subselect