| From: | Kyle <kyle(at)actarg(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RI permission problem |
| Date: | 2001-04-25 18:45:06 |
| Message-ID: | 3AE71B32.1040CF9@actarg.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Kyle writes:
>
> > Is there a way to get this to work without granting update to table b?
>
> Update to 7.1.]
I'm on 7.1. Should an RI trigger under 7.1 run as the DBA or as the current
user?
>
>
> > Tom, I understand someone was working on setuid functions. Is that a
> > long way off? It would be nifty if triggers could execute with the
> > privileges of the user that created them rather than the user who is
> > executing them. This would help greatly in closing some security holes
> > like this we are dealing with.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| kyle.vcf | text/x-vcard | 185 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2001-04-25 19:15:51 | Error explaination? |
| Previous Message | Peter J. Schoenster | 2001-04-25 18:42:50 | use of arrow keys to traverse history |