Re: Re: Call for platforms

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-26 20:36:19
Message-ID: 3ABFA843.42118104@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> "PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
> to onlookers ...

Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
follow-on to the 60x series, and there is a 7xxx series also. From my
pov, using an accepted label, rather than a marketing (re)label, better
indicates *what* this actually can run on. I'm not sure that I have it
labeled correctly yet, but "G3" is not a step in the right direction.

As we both found, it is difficult to wade through Apple's own docs to
decipher which processor is actually built into the system.

Should I put "Mac G3" in the comment section?

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-03-26 20:39:10 Re: Re: Call for platforms
Previous Message Scott Gritton 2001-03-26 20:21:55 Starting Postmaster

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-03-26 20:39:10 Re: Re: Call for platforms
Previous Message Adriaan Joubert 2001-03-26 19:30:32 Unsigned ints