Re: PostgreSQL on multi-CPU systems

From:	Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To:	Thomas Graichen <thomas(dot)graichen(at)innominate(dot)com>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: PostgreSQL on multi-CPU systems
Date:	2001-03-13 15:31:02
Message-ID:	3AAE3D36.C91B64AF@alumni.caltech.edu
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2001-03-08 12:50:15 from darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)  2001-03-12 20:10:06 from Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org>  2001-03-13 00:40:01 from Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>   2001-03-13 00:45:16 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>    2001-03-13 07:24:20 from Thomas Graichen <news-list(dot)pgsql(dot)hackers(at)innominate(dot)de>     2001-03-13 15:31:02 from Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>      2001-03-13 17:09:03 from Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>    2001-03-15 12:53:17 from darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)     2001-03-15 14:58:46 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: PostgreSQL on multi-CPU systems at 2001-03-13 07:24:20 from Thomas Graichen

Responses

• Re: Re: PostgreSQL on multi-CPU systems at 2001-03-13 17:09:03 from Matthew Kirkwood

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Bruce Momjian	2001-03-13 15:32:24	Re: Do we still need PowerPC-specific timestamp_is_current/epoch?
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2001-03-13 15:19:20	Re: Performance monitor