Re: postgresql upgrade/downgrade -- help!

From: will trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, debian-user(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql upgrade/downgrade -- help!
Date: 2001-02-28 06:29:14
Message-ID: 3A9C9AB7.8EDA0FC6@serensoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Oliver Elphick wrote:
> will trillich wrote:
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 4 Feb 27 12:24 PG_VERSION
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 0 Oct 13 21:05 active
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 8192 Feb 27 04:00 cust
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16384 Feb 22 00:35 cust_handle_key
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 8192 Feb 22 00:35 cust_id_seq
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16384 Feb 22 00:35 cust_sendto_idx
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16384 Feb 22 00:35 cust_source_idx
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 0 Oct 4 21:24 exp
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 0 Oct 4 21:13 ponly
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 8192 Feb 27 04:00 puzct
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 0 Sep 29 12:01 puzno
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 8192 Feb 27 04:00 range
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16384 Feb 11 07:39 range_pkey
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 8192 Aug 5 2000 sell
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16384 Aug 5 2000 sell_id_idx
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 0 Oct 1 11:52 tot
> >-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 0 Oct 13 21:04 unconf
> >
> >unconf, tot, puzno, ponly, exp, active are views; the *idx/*key are
> >indexes, *seq is the one sequence, and the rest are tables.

and according to the automatic_upgrade.log file elsewhere, it
first balked at datatypes needing explicit casts (as if reading
a sql source file from a database dump, which i can't seem to find)
and then died when unable to load plpgsql.so (or something along
those lines). if i can find that dump sql file, i'm all set!

> >actually, i think the 'range' table is the main one i need to
> >resurrect... everything else is gravy.
>
> What exactly is missing from it? It seems to have data in it, by its
> size...

my thoughts exactly.

\d shows this:
Name | Type | Owner
-------------+----------+-------
active | view | will
cust | table | will
cust_id_seq | sequence | will
exp | view | will
paid | table | will
ponly | view | will
puzno | table | will
sell | table | will
tot | table | will
unconf | view | will
(10 rows)

altho "puzct" and "range" are listed in /var/lib/postgresql/data/base/puz/
they don't show up as contributing members of society... and of course,
those are the two i'd like to get my knuckles into!

--

thanks for your help, oliver, here and in the past! i'd still be stuck
way back in the dark ages without your patient direction....

--
mailto:will(at)serensoft(dot)com
http://www.dontUthink.com/

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-28 06:32:16 Re: What is the best way to select all user defined field names in a table?
Previous Message Yasuo Ohgaki 2001-02-28 05:55:32 What is the best way to select all user defined field names in a table?